Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Link Building Tips 2014: Matt Cutts Says “How Many Links On a Page Should We Have?”

Google has been published most important link building factors video regarding webmaster help and how many links you should have on a page.
In a short language, Google advised to us, our websites not to have more than a hundred links on a page. But now we can get by with more than that. According to Cutts there’s no real limit, though there might be. Just don’t have too many. But don’t worry about it too much.
Confused? That’s because there’s no genuine answer at this time. The necessary gist is just: be logical. Of course that’s subjective, but here’s what Cutts says:
He says, “It used to be the case that Googlebot and our indexing system would truncate at 100 or 101K, and anything beyond that wouldn’t get indexed, and what we did, was we said, ‘Okay, if the page is 101K, 100K, then, you know, it’s reasonable to expect roughly one link per kilobyte, and therefore, something like 100 links on a page.’ So that was in our technical guidelines, and we said, you know, ‘This is what we recommend,’ and a lot of people assumed that if they had 102 links or something like that then we would view it as spam, and take action, but that was just kind of a rough guideline.”
“Nonetheless, the web changes,” he continues. “It evolves. In particular, webpages have gotten a lot bigger. There’s more rich media, and so it’s not all that uncommon to have aggregators or various things that might have a lot more links, so we removed that guideline, and we basically just now say, ‘Keep it to a reasonable number,’ which I think is pretty good guidance. There may be a limit on the file size that we have now, but it’s much larger, and at the same time, the number of links that we can process on a page is much larger.”
“A couple factors to bear in mind,” he notes. “When you have PageRank, the amount of PageRank that flows through the outlinks is divided by the number of total outlinks, so if you have, you know, 100 links, you’ll divide your PageRank by 100. If you have 1,000 links, you’ll divide your PageRank by 1,000. So if you have a huge amount of links, the amount of PageRank that’s flowing out on each individual link can become very, very small. So the other thing is it can start to annoy users, or it can start to look spammy if you have tons and tons and tons of links, so we arewilling to take action on the webspam side if we see so many links that it looks really, really spammy.”
If you’re concerned about having too many links on a page, Cutts suggests getting a “regular user,” and testing it out with them to see if they think it has too many links.
So, in the end, just ask a friend, “Hey man, do you think this page has too many links?”

Problem solved.

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Matt Cutts: All Pages Needs To Have a Unique Meta Description

In Search Engine Optimization (SEO) world, website keywords rank is getting hard in Google search engine. Google needs to require all things are unique and informative to users.

Now we are discussing about Meta description. Google’s head of search spam Matt Cutts asking to us regarding Meta description in his recent video where a human writes in to ask.

Is it required for each single page in website to have a unique Meta tag description?

Matt Cutts says there are only two options for Meta tag description.

  • You can make a unique Meta tag description.    
  • You never elect to put a same Meta tag description At all. Definitely don’t have duplicate Meta tag     descriptions.

If you want to find duplicate content on your website, It is very simple to find and avoiding duplicate meta tag description by registering and verifying your website with the free Google Webmaster Tools console. Google will crawl your website and tell you if they find duplicate Meta tag descriptions.

Generally speaking, Matt says it’s probably not worth your time to write a unique Meta tag description for every single page on your website. Matt doesn’t even bother to do that on his own blog.

Matt recommends doing this only on pages that really matter. Such as your home page or pages that have high ROI. If you notice that some of your pages have really bad auto-generated snippets, you should consider writing a unique Meta tag description for those as well.

To sum everything up, you should avoid having duplicate Meta tag descriptions on all pages. Instead, write unique descriptions for some pages and just let Google auto-generate the rest.

What do you reflect about Matt Cutts’ newest video? Do you write unique Meta tag descriptions for all pages? Let me know in the comments section!

You can see the full video below: 


Tuesday, November 19, 2013

SEO Tips: Matt Cutts Says More Indexed Pages Doesn’t Always Equal Better Rank

In the latest Webmaster Help video from Matt Cutts, he received a question from Leah in New York, if wanted to know that more indexed pages will automatically equal better ranking on search queries on Google.

As Matt goes on to explain, while more pages that all contain great content as certainly a good thing, webmasters shouldn’t simply create more pages that aren’t useful in order to hopefully increase the index rate and the overall page rank for the website.

While Matt Cutts does assert that having indexed pages that have applicable keywords that users are searching for make them more likely to have a better pagerank, he goes on to further assert that this doesn’t guarantee better page rankings for your entire website.
This latest video is another reminder that when it comes to website page content, quality over quantity is an important guideline.

Monday, November 18, 2013

Matt Cutts Opinion about Blog Comments, Links & Spam: Use Only Name Not Keywords

Nowadays we are moving on 80% on-page activities for good keywords ranking in Google by SEO and also forgot to some most important factors about link building like forum posting, directory submission and blog commenting etc.

Recent days, Matt Cutts share to us his opinion regarding blog commenting. Which factors we have to follow get strong back links threw out blog commenting.

If you've ever wondered whether those links from comments on blogs would hurt or help your SEO strategy, Matt Cutts is tackling this scenario in his latest webmaster help video from Google.

Google's Webmaster Guidelines discourage forum signature links but what about links from comments? Is link building by commenting against Google Webmaster Guidelines? What if it's a topically relevant site and the comment is meaningful?

Matt Cutts

Cutts said this is the kind of thing he does all the time. He often posts comments on blogs, that are topically relevant, and he links to his own personal blog rather than the Google webmaster help blog or website.

I leave topically relevant comments on topically relevant sites all the time. So somebody posts an SEO conspiracy theory and I'm like, "No, that's not right," I'll show up and a leave a comment that says, "Here is the pointer that shows this is not correct," or, "Here's the official word," or something like that. And I'll just leave a comment with my name, and often even point to my blog rather than Google's webmaster blog, because I'm just representing myself. So lots of people do that all the time and it is completely fine.

He does caution that how you represent yourself in a link can make the difference. He suggested users use the person only rather than the company name or keyword-rich "name" to avoid any problems.

The sorts of things that I would start to worry about is it's better to often leave your name so someone knows who they are dealing with, rather than "cheap study tutorials" or "fake driver's license", or whatever the name of your business is, often that will get a chillier reception than if you show up with your name.

He also warns that blog comments should not be the main part of your link building strategy. Having a large portion of those backlinks coming from blog comments, it can raise red flags with Google.

If you’re primary link building strategy is to leave comments all over the web, to the degree that you have a huge fraction of your link portfolio comments, and no real people linking to you, then at some point that can be considered a link scheme. At a very high level we reserve the right to take action on any sort of deceptive or manipulative link schemes that we consider to be distorting or rankings.

But he does reiterate that as you go about your day shouldn't be a concern.

But if you just doing regular organic comments and not doing it as an "OK, I have to leave this many comments a day every single day because that's what I'm doing to build links to my sites," you should be completely fine and it's not the sort of thing you should be worried about it all.

As long as you aren't actively using blog comments as a way to increase your backlink profile significantly, you are posting on topically relevant blogs, and you aren't using the a spammy keyword heavy name, but are using your real name instead, you should be fine and not get penalized.